You are viewing gaulish_recon

gaulish_recon

Website!

Sep. 1st, 2011 | 12:19 am
posted by: indus_brennii_f in gaulish_recon

I've been quietly hammering away at the Gaulish reconstructionist website I was talking about a couple of years ago. It's no longer in such a woeful state of construction—the French pages anyway—that I feel like it needs to be kept under wraps. I'd appreciate it if people could have a look, and especially if you give feedback! The site is now laden with my perhaps too strongly worded opinions; I would be happy to work on it so that it becomes as inclusive as it can fairly be.

By the way, I'm extremely pleased to see the new Facebook group. Hopefully this can really help facilitate the sharing of ideas. Apologies for not being active on LiveJournal in an age. Greetings to Kevin Seguin and all the rest of our little community!

Link | Leave a comment {1} | Share

Cosmology?

Sep. 24th, 2010 | 01:01 pm
location: United States, Maine, Scarborough
mood: frustratedfrustrated
posted by: saorbhreathach in gaulish_recon

Besides the Coligny calendar, and written accounts of the otherworld and afterlife beliefs, is there any surviving Gaulish or Gallo-Roman cosmological beliefs? I'm looking for anything like worlds trees, other surviving calendars, documents on afterlife, underworld/otherworld etc. (Not saying that any of these things are necessarily out there) I'm just having trouble finding anything.
Tags:

Link | Leave a comment | Share

gaulish_recon

Notions of Belisama?

Mar. 25th, 2010 | 07:58 am
location: Southeast of Disorder
mood: curiouscurious
music: "Trouble On the Horizon", -JB
posted by: chronarchy in gaulish_recon

I'm advising on our local ADF Grove's Beltaine ritual, and they're looking to honour Belisama (along with Belenos) for the rite. I took a look around and didn't find much on Belisama (I'm not immediately familiar with her, myself), but they're interested in the derivation of her name, which they found at http://www.celtnet.org.uk/gods_b/belisama.html to mean "Bight Summer." This seems to indicate that perhaps she's got some fire associations.

MacKillop indicates:

"Belisama, Belesama, Belisma. A lake- and river-goddess venerated in Gaul and Britain. Roman commentators equated her with Minerva. Ptolomy (2nd cent. AD) gives her name to the Ribble River in central England. She was also venerated at what is now Vaison (Vaucluse) in south-eastern France."


Two particular things I'm trying to wrap my head around are these:

1) Associations with fire. I'm not seeing many here. They'd be okay with that (this goddess is also new to them), and they're concerned with getting it "right".

2) Appropriateness as consort to Belenos. I see some information where maybe they match up, but it's hard to follow. I'm not sure where the information comes from.

3) Appropriateness with Beltaine itself. This looks to be a celebration of fertility and sexuality, and the association with Minerva indicates that we might be dealing with a "virgin-type" goddess, which makes me a bit uncomfortable. Not that it's easy to tell with Roman interpretations.

So, any notions you guys might have about this goddess, any thoughts you can bring forth would be appreciated. I'm continuing my own research, but something's not sitting right with me on this one.

Thanks!

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Share

gaulish_recon

pairings of deities in gaul

Dec. 3rd, 2009 | 09:04 pm
posted by: iarra in gaulish_recon

I have noticed from reading about dedications in Gaul that there are quite a few pairings of gods and goddesses. I'm curious if anyone knows anything about this? Was it common throughout the Roman empire or unique to the Celtic regions, or Gaul? Does it tell us anything? It reminds me a bit of how in contemporary Hinduism a married pair of deities is often worshiped together but of course the time difference is too great to try and make a connection, I think.

Link | Leave a comment {3} | Share

gaulish_recon

Thoughts on the Future of Revived Paganism

Aug. 27th, 2008 | 05:44 pm
posted by: owl_clan in gaulish_recon









Okay, I've decided to write a series of letters to discuss the future of revived Paganism. Understand that I have to make a distinction here between "Witchcraft" in the traditional sense- which is really a wide-ranging term including many forms of sorcery, all of which can (and do) exist despite the culture that surrounds them. Some cultures make it hard to be a sorcerer or practice occult/sorcerous arts, but still, they persist. Traditional Witchcraft, in the true modern sense, is a phenomenon that existed during Christian times, and now exists in the skeptical/scientific post-Christian era.

I don't worry too much about the "future" of Witchcraft; it will always remain, no matter how small or diffuse it is, because people will always seek out fringe elements of spirituality or the occult, regardless of society or culture's mainstream beliefs.

But what of "revived" Paganism, such as Asatru, Celtic Reconstructionism, Hellenism, Romuva, and the other revived Indo-European Pagan models? They have adherents, good lore and sources, reasonably strong structure as far as rituals and notions of sacred days and seasons: they have all they need to induct newborns and converts into their communities, and all they need to marry people and bury them, with rites. These revived faiths are pretty much complete faiths, with one exception: they all have pretty small populations of adherents.

So where do they go from here? A small population is bad news, for many reasons, but chiefly because small numbers means "little known", even in this day and age of the internet. "Little known" means "little or no political and legal recognition", and that means no support from anyone or anything else other than whatever few people (if any) you have near you that also practice your faith or believe as you do.


Hit this link for moreCollapse )

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Share

gaulish_recon

The importance of mythology?

Apr. 11th, 2008 | 02:48 pm
posted by: eydimork in gaulish_recon

Last week in pagan_prompt, the topic was mythology and what role it plays in our paths. Since then, I've been considering discussions of mythology on other reconstructionist fora, and I thought I'd pose the question here.

What role does mythology play for you, and what mythology would that be?

My long-winded answer, for those interested, is located here.
Tags:

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Share

gaulish_recon

Gaulish reconstructionism on the web?

Apr. 11th, 2008 | 12:09 am
posted by: indus_brennii_f in gaulish_recon

As we all know, there's an awful lot of nonsense out there on the internet. When that nonsense concerns the undying gods of our forebears ... well, that's not cool. I'd really like to set matters to right, to the extent possible, in at least one place on the web. So here's a project I've been mulling over for some time, and I'd really like to make a go of it: To build a central, trilingual (French/English/German) online resource for both study and devotion along Gaulish reconstructionist lines. There should be an academic side (comparable to the Greek theoi.com or Nantonos' epona.net) as well as a devotional one (with online shrines where one can leave votive offerings, and practical information on things like holy days, rituals, sacred spaces, divination etc – Nova Roma has some comparable resources).

Is anybody else seeing what I'm seeing? Anyone like to pitch in? Contributions could be of all sorts: prayers, original or traditional; photographs of cult statues, cult objects, sacred landscapes in Gaul; artwork; translations; and of course the intellectual fruits of our long studies. If properly flagged, UPG could even have a place on the site.

I'm convinced that many out there feel sincerely and lovingly drawn to the ancient gods, only to be drawn into shallow DIY theologies, or else discouraged from the way of the gods for lack of a sense of shared community or support. Can we not raise the Gaulish reconstructionist profile a bit? The CR FAQ itself has practically nothing to say about Gaulish reconstructionism, presumably because we're so under the radar (yet unlike the Iron Age Irish, the Gauls are actually known to have called themselves Celts...). What do we all say?

Link | Leave a comment {9} | Share

syncretism

Jan. 30th, 2008 | 08:08 pm
posted by: blacksealetters in gaulish_recon

So, here's my question ( cross posted to neos_alexandria)

If you are a religious syncretist, in this case roman and Celtic, and honor gods from two (or more) pantheons, do you consider it ok to honor Gods from different culture in the same rite? 

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Share

(no subject)

Jan. 14th, 2008 | 01:57 pm
posted by: blacksealetters in gaulish_recon

I have a question about your approach to Gaulish Reconstructionism.

Are you:
1. A pre-roman Celtic reconstructionist
2. a gallo-roman syncretist
3. both/neither/other

Link | Leave a comment {5} | Share

gaulish_recon

Re-thinking how we think about the Gods

Oct. 29th, 2007 | 12:54 pm
posted by: owl_clan in gaulish_recon



Good Day all:

Here is an essay I wrote (from a reconstructionist perspective) regarding Organic Religious Traditions and the journey some people end up taking through mythology and even beyond it.

Approaching the Gods Anew: Organic Religious Traditions and the Journey Beyond Mythology


http://cauldronborn.blogspot.com/2007/10/approaching-gods-anew-organic-religious.html


I'd love any comments or ideas.

RA

Link | Leave a comment | Share